<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arsenal 0-0 Tottenham: Eboue the game-wrecker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/</link>
	<description>Arsenal Blog &#124; Arsenal News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabregas</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-83508</link>
		<dc:creator>fabregas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-83508</guid>
		<description>hi fabregas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi fabregas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67170</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67170</guid>
		<description>i would like to say..&#039;what a shit post&#039;, but then that wouldn&#039;t exactly be productive...instead i&#039;d say this...
lay off Eboue will you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to say..&#8217;what a shit post&#8217;, but then that wouldn&#8217;t exactly be productive&#8230;instead i&#8217;d say this&#8230;<br />
lay off Eboue will you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radads RSA</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67095</link>
		<dc:creator>Radads RSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67095</guid>
		<description>@ TAYGOON: 100% AGREE WITH SF!!!!To me Fabregas could have never flourished without Flamini, the duo was just fantastic.Flamini is exactly the like of Clichy in the middle park and no doubt that we really miss him now.As I said, that was the biggest mistake that the Arsenal club has made this season, shud have kept him and gave him more money.Deni and Fab would never work, Deni subs for Fab, YES!!!Song needs more play time, and I can see that the lad likes women, thats why he lacks reflexes and engine.Song would be a very good successor for Flamini IF he stays away from ladies for a while to stay fit, and given more play time, thats why matured players can stay fully fit at the age of 24 to 28.
Sackin Le Boss would be a HUUUUGE mistake, many clubs out there are now desperatly dreamin of that to happen, But It will NEVER AND NEVER happen.
35% OF CHANCE TO WIN THE Pl TITTLE!!!?  Thats great!!Ive neva evn thought that we are still havin that much chances. 50% to be on the top4!!? Id rather say 95%, keeping 5% for injury.Top4 is dfntly guaranteed to me, I am a guy who beleive much in individual capacity of every single player, Only Walcott comin back and Arshavin on pitch, we are waiting for to see a completely different Arsenal team.Imagine now if Fab comes in!!! Plus, Im quite happy with Ade&#039;s injury so that we could see Edu in action again.Its not that Ade was so bad but Edu might be bringin different style and more dynamic activities by partnering with RVP.
My estimated line up on the 21st of Feb:
SAGNA-GALLAS-TOURE-CLICHY
-----------SONG---------
ARSHAVIN---DENI----NASRI
--BENDI/EDU--RVP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ TAYGOON: 100% AGREE WITH SF!!!!To me Fabregas could have never flourished without Flamini, the duo was just fantastic.Flamini is exactly the like of Clichy in the middle park and no doubt that we really miss him now.As I said, that was the biggest mistake that the Arsenal club has made this season, shud have kept him and gave him more money.Deni and Fab would never work, Deni subs for Fab, YES!!!Song needs more play time, and I can see that the lad likes women, thats why he lacks reflexes and engine.Song would be a very good successor for Flamini IF he stays away from ladies for a while to stay fit, and given more play time, thats why matured players can stay fully fit at the age of 24 to 28.<br />
Sackin Le Boss would be a HUUUUGE mistake, many clubs out there are now desperatly dreamin of that to happen, But It will NEVER AND NEVER happen.<br />
35% OF CHANCE TO WIN THE Pl TITTLE!!!?  Thats great!!Ive neva evn thought that we are still havin that much chances. 50% to be on the top4!!? Id rather say 95%, keeping 5% for injury.Top4 is dfntly guaranteed to me, I am a guy who beleive much in individual capacity of every single player, Only Walcott comin back and Arshavin on pitch, we are waiting for to see a completely different Arsenal team.Imagine now if Fab comes in!!! Plus, Im quite happy with Ade&#8217;s injury so that we could see Edu in action again.Its not that Ade was so bad but Edu might be bringin different style and more dynamic activities by partnering with RVP.<br />
My estimated line up on the 21st of Feb:<br />
SAGNA-GALLAS-TOURE-CLICHY<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;SONG&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
ARSHAVIN&#8212;DENI&#8212;-NASRI<br />
&#8211;BENDI/EDU&#8211;RVP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronaldo7</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronaldo7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67072</guid>
		<description>laninja you would have to be one of the most football smart posters i have come across since i have been reading this blog.

Agree with what you say.

To be honest i think the best way to play football atm is the fast counter attacking football with 2 brilliant players to be decisive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>laninja you would have to be one of the most football smart posters i have come across since i have been reading this blog.</p>
<p>Agree with what you say.</p>
<p>To be honest i think the best way to play football atm is the fast counter attacking football with 2 brilliant players to be decisive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ianinja</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ianinja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67068</guid>
		<description>If my stats are correct, the possibility of the current team based on individual players game stats that I so brilliantly calculated against the ratio of muscle mass per every square kilometer covered, Arsenal have a probability of 35% winning the league and 50% chance of finishing 4th. These forecast might change though because the spy I hired working at the emirates is still in his underground bunker thinking that the snowstorm is still ongoing. 

Hehe :P Anyway if we are going to be compiling data on players then Helb would be the most outstanding player in Arsenal last season who have completed passes and assists. 

I don&#039;t doubt stats but its not really important in football as oppose to American football where they actually have working formulas to a play and essentialy  the main catalyst to scoring a touchdown. 

Football has always been an artistic game, a team can have majority of possesion (hehe who could that team be) and end up losing or a team can play a counter attacking style and win or it may be up to one outstanding player (Ronaldo, Messi, maybe Arshavin) who would change games in an instant. 

Arsenal used to play a very fast 1-2 counterattacking style untill Cesc became the fulcrum and now we play a slower lots of touches possesion football. Recently the team had been trying to stretch the opponents to the corner flags and its a good sign that the lads are trying something different and pushing for that final decisive pass that they seem to be missing nowadays.

Denilson and Song will always be a backup untill both steps up a notch. Song was good during spurs game so give credit when due, and Denilson was awful. Both have the potential, its just up to them to push themselves even further. 

Cheers!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my stats are correct, the possibility of the current team based on individual players game stats that I so brilliantly calculated against the ratio of muscle mass per every square kilometer covered, Arsenal have a probability of 35% winning the league and 50% chance of finishing 4th. These forecast might change though because the spy I hired working at the emirates is still in his underground bunker thinking that the snowstorm is still ongoing. </p>
<p>Hehe <img src='http://arsenalfcblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway if we are going to be compiling data on players then Helb would be the most outstanding player in Arsenal last season who have completed passes and assists. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t doubt stats but its not really important in football as oppose to American football where they actually have working formulas to a play and essentialy  the main catalyst to scoring a touchdown. </p>
<p>Football has always been an artistic game, a team can have majority of possesion (hehe who could that team be) and end up losing or a team can play a counter attacking style and win or it may be up to one outstanding player (Ronaldo, Messi, maybe Arshavin) who would change games in an instant. </p>
<p>Arsenal used to play a very fast 1-2 counterattacking style untill Cesc became the fulcrum and now we play a slower lots of touches possesion football. Recently the team had been trying to stretch the opponents to the corner flags and its a good sign that the lads are trying something different and pushing for that final decisive pass that they seem to be missing nowadays.</p>
<p>Denilson and Song will always be a backup untill both steps up a notch. Song was good during spurs game so give credit when due, and Denilson was awful. Both have the potential, its just up to them to push themselves even further. </p>
<p>Cheers!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramugunner</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67049</link>
		<dc:creator>ramugunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67049</guid>
		<description>Flamini was my player of the season also. He did three good things very nicely;
1. Bringing muscle and hardness in the middle park which we don&#039;t have at all this season. 
2. Allowing Cesc to play his game. He guarded the defense so well and won ball back when not in possession.
3. Playing triangular passing game with Cesc and Hleb. 

His best performance should be against Milan when he didn&#039;t allow Kaka to do anything for 180+ minutes. We dominated a midfield with Kaka, Pirlo and Seederof.

I don&#039;t agree with Spanishfry about Song. He has no ability to make a solid partnership with Cesc in the middle for 2 reasons: 1. Too slow on the ball. 2. Can&#039;t make a 10 yard pass. Cesc can never flourish under him. I agree Song had good 20 minutes against Spurs and few decent games this seaosn. To play a decent 20 minutes in one game and disappear for another 5 games in not good enough. If you remember he was eaten alive by Hull&#039;s Ashbee and Stoke&#039;s Olonfinjana. I haven&#039;t seen one excellent game from him in Arsenal shirt. Never been selected as Man of the match in the pich playing for Arsenal. I still think his best place to play is Charlton United.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flamini was my player of the season also. He did three good things very nicely;<br />
1. Bringing muscle and hardness in the middle park which we don&#8217;t have at all this season.<br />
2. Allowing Cesc to play his game. He guarded the defense so well and won ball back when not in possession.<br />
3. Playing triangular passing game with Cesc and Hleb. </p>
<p>His best performance should be against Milan when he didn&#8217;t allow Kaka to do anything for 180+ minutes. We dominated a midfield with Kaka, Pirlo and Seederof.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with Spanishfry about Song. He has no ability to make a solid partnership with Cesc in the middle for 2 reasons: 1. Too slow on the ball. 2. Can&#8217;t make a 10 yard pass. Cesc can never flourish under him. I agree Song had good 20 minutes against Spurs and few decent games this seaosn. To play a decent 20 minutes in one game and disappear for another 5 games in not good enough. If you remember he was eaten alive by Hull&#8217;s Ashbee and Stoke&#8217;s Olonfinjana. I haven&#8217;t seen one excellent game from him in Arsenal shirt. Never been selected as Man of the match in the pich playing for Arsenal. I still think his best place to play is Charlton United.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramugunner</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67040</link>
		<dc:creator>ramugunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67040</guid>
		<description>Scolari&#039;s sacking is good for Chelski and bad for Arsenal. I loved Scolari for his football and success who is often regarded as one of the best managers of this time. Why not? He has won many things in Brazil and hell of a &quot;World Cup&quot;. He struggled at club level because of key injuries(essien) and star players under-performing like Drogba, Terry.
Arsenal Hero Tony Adams also got sacked, felt sorry for him. 

If Chelski sign Guus Hiddink, that would be worst for Arsenal. No matter whoever comes in, they will bring more energy and determination to save their season. 

4th place is looking more unrealistic for us game after game. Not to win a game almost for a month and to score one goal in 4 league games proves the fact. We are struggling to score goals so badly after Cesc got injured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scolari&#8217;s sacking is good for Chelski and bad for Arsenal. I loved Scolari for his football and success who is often regarded as one of the best managers of this time. Why not? He has won many things in Brazil and hell of a &#8220;World Cup&#8221;. He struggled at club level because of key injuries(essien) and star players under-performing like Drogba, Terry.<br />
Arsenal Hero Tony Adams also got sacked, felt sorry for him. </p>
<p>If Chelski sign Guus Hiddink, that would be worst for Arsenal. No matter whoever comes in, they will bring more energy and determination to save their season. </p>
<p>4th place is looking more unrealistic for us game after game. Not to win a game almost for a month and to score one goal in 4 league games proves the fact. We are struggling to score goals so badly after Cesc got injured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanish Fry</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67037</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanish Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67037</guid>
		<description>And my final backing of Flamini is this. Of the seven games we lost last season (all competitions), Flamini&#039;s involvement was as follows:

+ 3-1 to Sevilla (Unused Sub)
+ 2-1 to Middlesborough (Injured - DNP)
+ 5-1 to Tottenham (Unused Sub)
+ 4-0 to Manchester United (Late Sub, Arsenal already 3-0 down)
+ 2-1 to Chelsea (Played 88 mins)
+ 4-2 to Liverpool (Injured on 42 mins, scores level at 1-1 at the time)
+ 2-1 to Manchester United (Injured - DNP)

So as you can see, the only game he played in full that we lost was the 2-1 defeat at Chelsea. In my opinion that&#039;s a pretty comprehensive account of the defensive stability Flamini brought to the side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And my final backing of Flamini is this. Of the seven games we lost last season (all competitions), Flamini&#8217;s involvement was as follows:</p>
<p>+ 3-1 to Sevilla (Unused Sub)<br />
+ 2-1 to Middlesborough (Injured &#8211; DNP)<br />
+ 5-1 to Tottenham (Unused Sub)<br />
+ 4-0 to Manchester United (Late Sub, Arsenal already 3-0 down)<br />
+ 2-1 to Chelsea (Played 88 mins)<br />
+ 4-2 to Liverpool (Injured on 42 mins, scores level at 1-1 at the time)<br />
+ 2-1 to Manchester United (Injured &#8211; DNP)</p>
<p>So as you can see, the only game he played in full that we lost was the 2-1 defeat at Chelsea. In my opinion that&#8217;s a pretty comprehensive account of the defensive stability Flamini brought to the side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanish Fry</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67035</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanish Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67035</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll add this quote from my mid-term report card from last season: http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-mid-term-report-card-part-2/

&quot;Mathieu Flamini
In my opinion, the standout performer in the Arsenal team this season. Has put in the hard work to go from third or four-choice at the end of last season to becoming arguably the most important member of the midfield. Flamini’s energy and workrate has been phenomenal, his partnership with Fabregas vital, and he has not played poorly once thus far. Irreplaceable. (A+)

Cesc Fabregas
The little Spaniard’s form has dipped a little of late but his contribution in the first third of the season has been vital. When on song Fabregas has regularly been a match-winner, scoring goals at crucial times. His fitness, ball control and excellent passing has allowed him to dictate the play on many occasions. (A)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll add this quote from my mid-term report card from last season: <a href="http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-mid-term-report-card-part-2/" rel="nofollow">http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-mid-term-report-card-part-2/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Mathieu Flamini<br />
In my opinion, the standout performer in the Arsenal team this season. Has put in the hard work to go from third or four-choice at the end of last season to becoming arguably the most important member of the midfield. Flamini’s energy and workrate has been phenomenal, his partnership with Fabregas vital, and he has not played poorly once thus far. Irreplaceable. (A+)</p>
<p>Cesc Fabregas<br />
The little Spaniard’s form has dipped a little of late but his contribution in the first third of the season has been vital. When on song Fabregas has regularly been a match-winner, scoring goals at crucial times. His fitness, ball control and excellent passing has allowed him to dictate the play on many occasions. (A)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanish Fry</title>
		<link>http://arsenalfcblog.com/arsenal-0-0-tottenham-eboue-the-game-wrecker/#comment-67032</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanish Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arsenalfcblog.com/?p=1551#comment-67032</guid>
		<description>@ Gibbs - I can&#039;t say for sure whether he&#039;s struggling or not this season, I don&#039;t watch enough Italian football, but there&#039;s no doubt in my mind that had he stayed then he would have played well again. It&#039;s also not my opinion that he was a one-season wonder. I always liked Flamini as a player, his energy in the middle was always there in the few opportunities he got earlier on at Arsenal, it was just his passing and ability on the ball that needed improving. He improved this are and had a good season as a result.

The other thing that needs to be taken into account is that Flamini and Cesc worked incredibly well together. They were, last season, one of the best midfield partnerships in Europe. Cesc trusted Flamini&#039;s ability to retain posession and cover the defence and this allowed the Spaniard to push forward more often. On the flipside, when Flamini did push forward - which he did a lot more than people maybe remember - Cesc was often happy to sit back. Sometimes you can&#039;t explain why players just click, but Cesc and Flamini clicked and it was a shame to lose that.

My personal opinion is that Cesc has the ability to make his midfield partner look good, but Flamini was exceptional. Song and Cesc is a partnership with great potential, in my opinion, while Cesc and Denilson is not. The Brazilian just does not have the tackling ability nor the defence-first mentality that Flamini had and Song has. That&#039;s the difference between the pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Gibbs &#8211; I can&#8217;t say for sure whether he&#8217;s struggling or not this season, I don&#8217;t watch enough Italian football, but there&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that had he stayed then he would have played well again. It&#8217;s also not my opinion that he was a one-season wonder. I always liked Flamini as a player, his energy in the middle was always there in the few opportunities he got earlier on at Arsenal, it was just his passing and ability on the ball that needed improving. He improved this are and had a good season as a result.</p>
<p>The other thing that needs to be taken into account is that Flamini and Cesc worked incredibly well together. They were, last season, one of the best midfield partnerships in Europe. Cesc trusted Flamini&#8217;s ability to retain posession and cover the defence and this allowed the Spaniard to push forward more often. On the flipside, when Flamini did push forward &#8211; which he did a lot more than people maybe remember &#8211; Cesc was often happy to sit back. Sometimes you can&#8217;t explain why players just click, but Cesc and Flamini clicked and it was a shame to lose that.</p>
<p>My personal opinion is that Cesc has the ability to make his midfield partner look good, but Flamini was exceptional. Song and Cesc is a partnership with great potential, in my opinion, while Cesc and Denilson is not. The Brazilian just does not have the tackling ability nor the defence-first mentality that Flamini had and Song has. That&#8217;s the difference between the pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
